PREVENT, CKM stage, disease burden, and validated clinical risk measures.
Review clinical risk →
Clinical Interpretation
Why Karen’s risk is elevated
Karen’s Whole Person Risk Score is 60, compared with a population mean of 34.
Elevated stress
Inconsistent restorative sleep
Suboptimal hydration
Cardiac rehabilitation opportunity
Care coordination opportunities
Highest-value next actions
- Initiate cardiac rehabilitation and structured exercise.
- Address sleep and stress using motivational interviewing.
- Reinforce hydration within clinically appropriate limits.
- Confirm understanding using teach-back.
- Coordinate follow-up through Karen’s care team.
Projected score after intervention
48
12-point modeled reduction
Open Karen’s AI Brief
Whole-Person Intelligence
Behavioral opportunity linked to clinical risk
ANSWERS Score
79
Whole-Person Intelligence
79
Healthy Day
82
My Life Check
84
PREVENT Risk
6.6%
Priority ANSWERS Domains
Stress · Water · Sleep
Open Karen’s Patient Intelligence
Engagement Intelligence
Recommended communication approach
Engagement Persona
Motivator
Readiness
72%
Confidence
68%
Ambivalence
Moderate
Explore ambivalence, reinforce progress, and collaboratively select one achievable next step.
“Just so I know I explained it clearly, what is the first step you plan to take?”
Today’s Actions for Karen
Open Karen's AI Brief
Review today's behavioral, clinical, engagement, and Digital Twin priorities.
Open →
Review Hybrid Chat
Review change talk, ambivalence, questions, and professional responses.
Open →
Create Persona-Aware Content
Generate Motivator-oriented education with plain language and teach-back.
Open →
Review Community Activity
Review Karen's moderated peer-support participation.
Open →
Review Exercise Session
Review cardiac rehabilitation adherence, symptoms, heart rate, and recovery.
Open →
Manage Karen's Care Team
Coordinate primary care, cardiology, cardiac rehabilitation, nutrition, and behavioral support.
Open →
Whole Person Risk Score
A unified view of clinical risk, near-term instability, and care-quality opportunity
Higher values indicate greater whole-person risk.
Total Risk
60
Higher than average
Lower risk
Population mean:
34
Higher risk
Patient: 60
Low
Moderate
High
Very High
Critical
What is driving the score?
Each segment contributes directly to the total risk score.
Symptoms, connected-health alerts, conversations, and Digital Twin state.
Review Digital Twin →ANSWERS, adherence, engagement, access, exercise, and care coordination.
Review Whole-Person Intelligence →Higher than average
Modeled improvement
Estimated effect of targeted and sustained intervention.
Current
60
Current whole-person state
→
Projected
48
After targeted intervention
→
Optimized
42
With sustained improvement
Patient Spotlight
Karen Davis
Age 62 · Hypertension · CKM Stage 3
Today’s clinical priority
Initiate cardiac rehabilitation
Connect Karen with structured exercise while addressing stress, sleep, confidence, and understanding.
Modeled risk
60
→ 48
After targeted intervention
Whole Person Intelligence Map
How Signatures understands Karen Davis
Clinical, behavioral, engagement, exercise, social, and care-team intelligence continuously update the Digital Twin and coordinated recommendations.
Whole Person Risk
60
Higher than average
Clinical
PREVENT 6.6%
CKM Stage 3
Behavioral
ANSWERS 79
Stress · Water · Sleep
Engagement
Motivator
Moderate ambivalence
Exercise
Cardiac rehabilitation
Eligible · Intake recommended
Social
Community support
Peer and family engagement
Care Team
5 participants
Coordinated follow-up
Evidence
Governed knowledge
Source integrity and provenance
KD
Karen Davis
Digital Twin Active
Updated 2 minutes ago
Clinical Workflow Hub
Coordinate Karen’s care from one workspace
Move directly from intelligence to clinical review, communication, intervention, and follow-up.
01
Communication
Hybrid Conversation
02
Review Karen’s questions, ambivalence, change talk, professional responses, and teach-back opportunities.
Open conversation →
Cardiac rehabilitation
Exercise Intelligence
03
Review prescription, participation, symptoms, heart rate, recovery, adherence, and next recommended session.
Review exercise →
Education
Persona-Aware Content
04
Create Motivator-oriented education using plain language, one achievable action, and teach-back.
Create content →
Prediction
Digital Twin
05
Compare current, projected, and optimized behavioral and clinical trajectories.
Review trajectory →
Social support
Community Activity
06
Review moderated peer participation, support signals, encouragement, and potential concerns.
Open community →
Coordination
Care Team and Follow-Up
Coordinate primary care, cardiology, rehabilitation, nutrition, behavioral support, and care partners.
Manage care →
Today’s Intelligence Brief
What the clinical team should know about Karen
Synthesized from clinical risk, ANSWERS, conversations, connected health, Engagement Intelligence, and the Digital Twin.
Priority signal
Whole Person Risk is elevated
Karen’s score of 60 is above the population mean of 34. Care Quality Risk remains a modifiable contributor.
Review risk composition →
Behavioral signal
Stress, sleep, and hydration need support
ANSWERS identifies three actionable behavioral priorities that can be incorporated into one manageable SMART Plan.
Review ANSWERS profile →
Engagement signal
Motivation is present, confidence is moderate
Use motivational interviewing to explore ambivalence, affirm progress, and collaboratively select one next action.
Open Hybrid Conversation →
Intervention opportunity
Cardiac rehabilitation offers the greatest impact
Structured exercise can address clinical risk, confidence, Healthy Day performance, and care-quality opportunity.
Review Exercise Intelligence →
Recommended opening
“You’ve already made progress. What feels like the most realistic health change for you this week?”
Teach-back prompt
“Just so I know I explained it clearly, what is the first step you plan to take?”
Expected impact
Whole Person Risk:
60
→ 48
Engagement Intelligence Demonstration
How should Signatures communicate with Karen?
Clinical recommendations remain unchanged. Communication adapts to Karen's engagement persona, readiness, confidence, ambivalence, health literacy needs, and demonstrated understanding.
Motivational Interviewing Strategy
Explore ambivalence, reinforce progress, and collaboratively select one achievable next step.
“You’ve already made progress with walking. What feels like the most realistic next step for improving your sleep?”
Health Literacy Adaptation
Use plain language, explain one action at a time, and present cardiovascular risk using both percentages and natural frequencies.
“A PREVENT score of 6.6% means that about 7 out of 100 people with similar health information may experience cardiovascular disease within 10 years.”
Teach-Back
“Just so I know I explained it clearly, what is the first step you plan to take?”
Karen's response becomes a new understanding signal for the behavioral Digital Twin.
My Active Population
Patient Activity and Risk Management
Prioritize patients using whole-person risk, clinical signals, engagement activity, and next-best actions.
| Patient | Status | Whole-Person Risk | Primary Signal | Last Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karen Davis | Needs review | 60 | Stress, sleep, and hydration | Hybrid Chat today | Review |
| John Martinez | SMART Plan active | 44 | Prediabetes and exercise | Healthy Day yesterday | Review |
| Maria Garcia | Exercise overdue | 52 | Cardiac rehabilitation adherence | Exercise 4 days ago | Review |
| Robert Thompson | High flare risk | 71 | Heart failure symptoms | Connected alert today | Review |
| Emily Chen | Progressing | 29 | Prevention and nutrition | Learning module today | Review |